I prefer to stop down to f/5.6 because I find the bokeh at f/3.5 too distracting. Hi Phillip, long time reader of your website. Sigma innove avec cette nouvelle série I avec en plus du traditionnel capuchon d’objectif , un nouveau capuchon magnétique tout en métal qui se clipse par aimantation sur l’objectif. That is really a big mistake by my carelessness. In my experience they degrade the image quality a lot and I would advise against them. “Very bad” article gave me the urge to buy one! If you are interested in manual lenses a Sony a7-series would open many possibilities. Le Sigma est aussi bn au centre mais moins piqué dans les coins, Le Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN est l’optique avec le plus beau flou d’arrière plan et les meilleurs ronds de bokeh, suivi par le, Le rendu des couleurs est très bon sur le Sigma et le Tamron, il est moons bon sur le Samyang, Le Tamron est celui avec la pire distorsion mais heureusement il est automatiquement corrigé en Lightroom, Les AC sont présentes sur toutes les 3 optiques , mais plus faible sur le Sigma, Les effets d’étoiles sont le plus définis sur le Tamron, Le vignettage est le plus faible sur le Tamron, Portraits : Très Bon piqué et rendu dès F3.5 mais flou d’arrière plan limité, For de la rue ou de l’architecture , on gagnera à fermer à F5.6 pour avoir un Très Bon piqué dans les coins, AF très efficace et très bonnes couleurs naturelles en sortie de boitier, Excellente qualité de construction (supérieure au Sigma Art et Sony GM), Excellent à superbe piqué au centre sur 61Mpix, Compact et discret et léger (même si plus lourd que ses concurrents), Distance min de mise au point très courte (<11cm), Distorsion entièrement corrigé dans le boitier, Vignettage à F3.5 qui ne disparait pas complètement à F8, AC modérées (meilleur que les concurrents), Effet d’étoiles corrects mais peut mieux faire, Un peu de focus breathing visible en vidéo, Bague d’ouverture qui ne peut pas être “sans clics” pour la vidéo, Capuchon d’objectif magnétique non compatible avec le pare soleil, Coins seulement bons à F3.5 et f4 sur 61Mpix. Thanks for your review of the Minolta 35-70 3.5 lens. On est au dessus du niveau des Sigma Art ou des Sony GM. BSMEE BSMarE Bachelor of Science in Marine Engineering and Electro-technology The Maritime Academy of Asia and the Pacific is now authorized by the Commission on Higher Education to offer a new maritime program, Bachelor of Science in Marine Engineering and Electrotechnology or BSMEE. I have one but I am not that happy with it. I seem to be getting a lot of ghosting with the K&F MD adapter at 40 to 60mm is really bad 70mm is a bit better and 35mm no issue. Pre-order at Adorama @BastianK at phillipreeve.net review Thank you for your review! Thanks! L’ensemble est fixée très fermement et il faut saisir le capuchon par un renfoncement sur le pourtour du capuchon pour l’enlever. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Previous Post Minolta MD 50mm 1:2 Review Next Post Canon new FD 50 mm 1:1.4 Review 87 thoughts on “Minolta MD Zoom 35-70mm 1: 3.5 – Review” Pingback: Samsung 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 ED OIS Review | Matt Everglade Good review sir, I own this lens too and use it with Sony A7, the one with macro mode. Il est construit comme un tank et semble indestructible, les 2 autres font très plastique en comparaison.Le Sigma est aussi le seul avec un commutateur AF/MF et une bague d’ouverture, Le Tamron est le plus grand, gros et celui qui a le plus grand filtre, L’AF est très bon sur le Sigma et le Tamron, moins sur le Samyang, Background Blur & Bokeh Balls Portraits / Flous d’arrière plan – Ronds de Bokeh Portraits, The Sigma 24mm F3.5 is the best balanced lens with excellent shaprness in the centre (and good to very good corners), super smooth background blur, very good color rendition, very good bokeh balls, minimal distorsion, The Tamron 24mm F2.8 is very close with best sharpness overall (on 61Mpix) and very consistent from centre to corners, best sunstars , little bit less expensive but bulkier , less good build quality and a little bit less soft background blur, The Samyang 24mm F2.8 AF is honest but sharpness is only good, color rendition is less natural and background blur is quite busier, Le Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN est l’optique la plus équilibrée avec un piqué excellent au centre (et bon à très bon dans les coins) un flou d’arrière plan très doux, un très bon rendu des couleurs, de beaux ronds de bokeh, et une distorsion minimale, Le Tamron 24mm F2.8 est aussi très bon avec le meilleur piqué sur 61Mpix (consistant du centre aux coins) et les meilleurs effets d’étoiles et un prix moindre, mais avec un encombrement plus important, une moins bonne qualité de fabrication et un flou d’arrière plan un peu moins doux, Le Samyang 24mm F2.8 AF est honnête vu son prix , mais son piqué, rendu des couleur et flou d’arrière plan sont nettement moins bon, The Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN Contemporary (530 euros) is a special lens designed for heavy duty job on the field (reportage, street, shoot under the rain…). Hello The following two tabs change content below. The NiSi 15mm f/4 lens has now been announced. it also hase aclose focus setting, so a comparision with the minolta would be very interesting. For portraits tack sharp as of F3.5 but with limited background blur . MTF Services has just announced that the Sirui 24mm F/2.8 1.33, 35mm F/1.8 1.33x, and 50mm F/1.8 1.33x will now be available in Sony FZ Mount. In the center it is hard to tell the difference. Lens hud has no affect, have been using step down filter rings as a lens hud and they work really well but not the most practical as have to add and remove them depending on the focal length. It will be interesting to find out how it compares to the Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 III. Pas de risque de passez de F22 à la position A car il faut exercer une force supérieure pour passer en mode A. Pas de commutateur pour la rendre sans clics pour la vidéo Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art : dommage, La bague de mise au point n’est pas très large mais suffisamment pour une bonne préhension, elle est précise lors d’une mise au point manuelle, L’optique est fournie avec 2 capuchons d’objectifs : un standard et un magnétique que je passerai en revue au chapitre suivant, Sigma innovate with the new I series by proposing in addition to the standard lens cap, a magnetic lens cap: all in metal nicely finished and really sticking very well to the lens, They also propose a lens cap holder (CH-11) that will be available early 2021, The magnetic cap is easy to use on day to day and more convenient than the standard one that you need to pinch to put or remove from the lens but with one big caveat : when the lens hood is on it is virtually impossible to remove the magnetic cap as it stick so well and you do not have space for your fingers in the lens hood to access the side of the cap to remove it. i have canon fd 35-105 f3.5 macro. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I just got my Minolta MD 35-70mm macro zoom and it’s everything you said and more! The mk 2 seems to be a little sharper. The Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN is part of the new I Series of Sigma of High quality compact lenses. Let’s take a closer look at these lenses for Sony F5, F55, and F3 users! I have the first version MD I with the inscription Rokkor. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. did anyone test the nikkor 35-70 f3.5 AIs on A7? By today’s standards the built quality is very good but compared to the best manual lenses it isn’t that good. Based on my subjective assessment of the Sony 50mm 1.4 on the A7r ii, I see a loss in centre sharpness at f4, with deconvolution sharpening, then at f5.6. Apparently they often suffer from disintegrated bearings so I was a little hesitant to buy one. Sony Alpha BlogがNiSi「NiSi 15mm f/4」のレビューを公開。 バランスの良い光学性能と、汎用性の高いビルドクオリティを評価し、手ごろな価格を含めて「強くおススメできるレンズ」と言及しています。 A good enough adapter for SR-mount is this one: http://amzn.to/2jHIn6r If you want the very best adapter check out the Novoflex: http://amzn.to/2jhIxF2 f/5.6: Center and midframe region are very sharp, the corners are sharp. WeMacro Automatic focus stacking rail; MVE Automated focus stacking rail; Leofoto MP-150 Macro rail; Remote Control. In comparison with “modern ” lenses I think a plasticky feeling is not the problem here. I want to learn the full capabilities of this lens. All photos , taken with Sony A7RIV and without post processing are available in full size (61Mpix) in the following Flickr album suivant : Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN Contemporary, Help me to run this site and continue testing new lenses and products with a small donation, Toutes les photos de l’article, prises avec le sony A7RIV et sans aucunes retouches sont disponibles en pleine résolution (61Mpix) dans l’album flickr suivant : Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN Contemporary, Une petite donation de votre part m’aidera à maintenir ce site et à continuer à vous proposez des tests d’objectifs, The Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN is part of the new I Series of Sigma of High quality compact lenses. 【広告】PERGEAR2021年本気の大出血セール. Did you use a tripod when taking those macro shots with the NEX? How it is compared with this lens? If lightroom forces distortion correction on a lens, is it possible to use another raw converter to check for distortion as distortion correction is a lossy process both in the centre and edges. i found only very few reviews in the net, and mostly ken rockwell does praise this lens quite high. Nice review. and if yes what is the appropriate? Les coins sont à la traine à pleine ouverture, l’optimum sera atteint à F5.6 ce qui sera parfait pour du reportage ou de la photographie de rue, The competitor for the Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN (540 euros) are mainly the Tamron 24mm F2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 (F051) (450 euros) and the Samyang 24mm F2.8 AF (300 euros), Le Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN (530 euros) doit se comparer aux 2 autres 24 mm compact avec AF que sont les Tamron 24mm F2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 (F051) (450 euros) et le Samyang 24mm F2.8 AF (300 euros), From a specifications perspective the Sigma the most expensive with the slowest aperture , it is the heaviest. I wouldn’t really know the benefit of a lens profile for landscape photography. Both are related only to a small degree. Unfortunately no button to switch it to clickless like on the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The focusing ring is narrow but big enough for a good prehension and allows for precise manual focusing if need be, The lens is also delivered 2 lens cap : a traditional one and one magnetic that I will detail in next chapter, La première impression que l’on a avec cet objectif est sa qualité de construction. f/11: The center is a little less sharp, only the very last few pixels of the corners are unsharp. Significantly less cost, but is the Contax vastly superior sharpness? The original hood is rather small and protects the front element without adding too much size. I was just reading another forum discussing this lens in 2014 and saw many of your beautiful flowers taken in macro mode with NEX 6. I didn’t see see Rokker in the pics so hopefully is ok. I see in your review for the Novaflex you have coated a cheap adapter with something, can you recommend anything. sergr. The Minolta MD 35-70mm 1:3.5 is a versatile lens, because it performs so well it can replace 2 or 3 primes and make your bag much lighter. You activate a switch and turn the zoom ring behind the 70mm marking and the image is magnified. The lens has a very long short focusing distance of 80cm, most 35mm primes are at 30cm and most 50mm lenses at 45cm so they offer a much higher magnification. 0 Zeiss 100mm makro planar f/2, fringing and f stop advice ... Nisi … Hi, how do this lens compare with full frame kit lens Sony 28-70mm, f/3.5-5.6 OSS in terms of Sharpness, CA, Contrast etc? The later would be a little more versatile. The lens has 7 straight aperture blades. i haven’t seen yet a review on full frame A7. I have the LEICA VARIO-ELMAR-R 1:4.5/35-70 mm and I’m not sure if its exactly the same quality than the Minolta 1. It offers very reliable performance , excellent ergonomics in a very compact size and is very discrete if you work in a unsafe place, with very good results straight out of the camera and very good soft background blur for close shots, It is not a lens for the casual shooter that will prefer the, (450 euros) that offer a better aperture and better sharpness on 61Mpix and a bit more creative possibility thanks to it F2.8 aperture but with not at all the same build quality and ergonomics, Excellent to outstanding centre shaprness, Optimal results centre to corners achieved at F5.6, Compact , discrete and light (even if more heavy than competitors), Distorsion entirely corrected in built in profile, Moderate level of CA (but better than the Tamron and Samyang), Vignetting at F3.5 that does not disappear completely at F8, Magnetic lens cap is a good idea but is not compatible with the lens hood. They also have a line of Cine lenses in the PL, E and EF mounts that you could adapt to Fujifilm. I have it mounted on a Sony NEX-6. Happy holidays, and thank you for an informative and enjoyable blog. -Minolta 70-210 f4 beercan – recently bought with a simple AF-E mount adapter This website uses cookies to improve your experience. L’optique est fiable , compacte et très discrète ergonomique (bague d’ouverture) et délivre des images naturelles et consistantes. En effet quand la pare soleil est fixé , impossible d’accéder au bord du capuchon pour l’extraire et l’ensemble tient tellement bien qu’on ne peut l’enlever sans démonter le pare soleil, The tests were made on a Sony A7RIV with its 61Mpix, Les tests ont été effectués sur un A7RIV avec ses 61Mpix, The performances are excellent in the centre and become outstanding as soon as you close by one stop. Are you Using edge enhancement in addition to deconvolution to sharpen your photos? No risk of going from F22 to A mode by accident as you need to turn stronger to switch to A mode. The series includes already 4 lenses. It takes 72mm filters and is equipped with 10 straight blades for well defined sunstars! Since they are both Minolta MDs, would a simple A-mount to FE mount work? Yes you can, use thois adapter: http://amzn.to/2acDJvt (affiliate link). Yes i refocus Do you have any experience with or recommendations for Canon FD zooms in this focal length range, or thereabouts? Could I translate the “The Minolta list ” and “the manual lenses in general this beginners guide for a7 users” later? At  f/3.5 bokeh is a bit distracting because blur circles have a defined brighter edge. Thanks much. The Nikon is a totally different lens. ... Industar 50mm f3.5 50-2 Review. I once had a Pentax K35-105 F 3.5 macro, the macro of which works at all focal length. and if yes i need an adapter ? Now I try to found a good lens < 70mm. You will sacrifice some the ability to blur backgrounds though. I would be very surprised if that Minolta was any better than the cheaper kit lens. I bought on Ebay two used lens, one version 2 the other ver 3. Le Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN fait partie d’une nouvelle ligne d’optique chez Sigma la Série I qui a pour but d’offre un très haut niveau de qualité dans un format compact. when i bought it i just thought that my M42 would work on it, but realise that can’t be done. Love it so much I’m tempting to get the 70-150 as well. And have possibility to try it tomorrow. L’ensemble semble indestructible , tout en métal et parfaitement ajusté. This day I own the A6000 with only these lenses: Your email address will not be published. This is really my bad. It will be available for Canon RF, Sony E, Nikon Z and Fuji X mounts. Tested the first and last version of this lens and can confirm that the last has (much) better sharpness towards the corners. A very good lens to have. I like and use Minolta SR lenses a lot and this is a growing database of them. I have the AF version and i’m thinking of getting an adaptor for my A7, do you know any decent adaptors AF to nex (but only for MF ). The aperture ring has full stops from f/3.5 to f/5.6 and f/16 to f/22 and half stops from f/5.6 to f/16. I would say a little better so that it only matters for a few scenarios, Your email address will not be published. Sorry to bring up this old thread, but how would this lens compare to a C/Y 35-70 f/3.4? You can find some more samples in this flickr set: Minolta MD 3.5/35-70. I think when in body imager correction are turned on on the body it embedded it in the raw. Thank you for these reviews and the one on the hundred millimeter MD as well you’re reviews or what’s swaying me to pick up a nice little set I’m getting from a couple here in New York I’m getting the samyang 35 to 70 3.5 / 4.5 the 100 mm MD 2.5 the 50 mm 1.7 which I already have and I’m getting some Bellows and extension tubes and then X700 camera if all goes well $200. For street /architecture you gain some corners sharpness if you close at F5.6, Very reliable AF , very nice colors straight out of the camera, The Sigma 24mm F3.5 DG DN Contemporary (530 euros) is a special lens designed for heavy duty job on the field (reportage, street, shoot under the rain…). As I do not have the lens anymore I can’t retest without those corrections off. Best regards, Sala. All for a tidy £49 off ebay. For build quality however, the MD I version is superior. Could be good, could be bad; this review of the Minolta won’t tell you anything about it’s performance. Contrast is a bit lower. Minolta MD 35-70mm 1:3.5 full resolution samples, Announced: Voigtlander 35mm F2 Apo-Lanthar, Samsung 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 ED OIS Review | Matt Everglade, Sony Tidbits…(Gatorade commercial shot on the FS7) | sonyalpharumors, Manual lenses on the Sony a7 - A beginners guide, Minolta Lenses on the Sony a7 - ratings, impressions and sample images - phillipreeve.net, Samsung 20-50mm F3.5-5.6 II Review | Matt Everglade, Working with the Sony Alpha 7 Tips and Tricks, Auf neuen Wegen (Im Venn II) | Marc Heckert, Sony FE lenses: A comprehensive and independent guide, Guide to Macro Lenses for the Sony a7 series, Beginner’s Guide to Manual Lenses on the Sony a7, Guide to Adapters for Manual Lenses on the Sony a7 series, The Guide to Canon FD lenses on the Sony a7 series, The rated List of Minolta MD/MC Lenses on the Sony a7, A beginners guide to landscape astro photography. Which Lenses to maximise the potential of the Sony A7RIV? The focusing ring is quite smooth, resistance is just right. Also, what features can I expect to lose? We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Thanks for helping me find my new favourite lens. this minolta 35-70 macro fuction only works at 70mm or it can be used all the way from 35 to 70mm? trying to get one, why the nikkor version should be avoided ? LA-EA3. I really appreciate your reviews. sergr • 2 days ago • review of Tamron 18-400mm F3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD. I’d like to know if I can use this on a Fujifilm X-T3? Fujifilm X-E4 initial review. Maybe the Minolta 35-70 F3.5 it's a good choice or two primes for a normal focal range. Learn how your comment data is processed. I think it is a bit sharper in the corners and CA a bit lower. Focus on the right wall -Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS – portrait If the Minolta scores better I would certainly buy it. “substance” means any natural or artificial substance [F3 (including micro‐organisims)], whether in solid or liquid form or in the form of a gas or vapour; . So globally the build quality is higher than the Sigma Art serie or Sony GM , they feel like Zeiss Legacy lenses or Voigtländer APO Lanthar lenses, The lens is equipped with a click only aperture ring that can also be switched to A= Auto mode to be controlled by the body. Hello, La série comprend déjà 4 optiques, The very first impression you get with this lens is its build quality , all in metal , perfectly adjusted , the lens hood itself feels indestructible. The link on the full resolution pic takes us to your 50/f2 not this zoom Btw. The Minolta 4/70-210 was initially released in SR-mount (called MD then) and later in A-mount. 2 days ago sergr. At f/5.6 the blur circles have a much less defined edge but they are now take the shape of the aperture with it’s seven not rounded blades. For this I really apreciate your work, this is my favorite blog at the moment. Contrast is good. f/3.5:The lens is sharp across the frame with only a little corner softening. Difficult to use for my sunsets and sunrises, rather pronounced flare. the field of view would be different and the image will be less sharp in the center but a tad better in the corners at 35mm. Flare resistance is better than I expected from a 1980’s zoom lens. It is also the only one with a MF/AF switch and an aperture ring with click, The Tamron is the biggest in length / diameter / filter size, The AF is very good on the Sigma and the Tamron , less on the Samyang, D’un point de vue spécifications, le Sigma est le plus cher malgré sa plus faible ouverture, c’est le plus lourd aussi (de peu). This Family Forms section provide a list of useful forms for customers to download and print out. the macro only works at 35mm. Thanks a lot. It is quite high an Jannik’s priority list and I would expect a review in Q1/2017. You may restore the article and keep it online aslong as your blog remains a non commercial project. I’ve been looking at this lens and the Minolta MD 28-85 3.5-4.5. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. See a test I encountered: https://youtu.be/ukIOKspxoiI. The aperture ring is made from plastics and clicks quite nicely. As mentioned in the alternatives section, do you think you’ll ever review the Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 3,4/35 â 70 mm or is the minolta cheaper and nearly as good? Minolta made three different 3.5/35-70 lenses. Do you know if a black matt paint could be applied to the adapter to reduse reflection. f/5.6: Contrast and sharpness are high across most of the frame now. Gen. Do you re-focus the lens when testing the corners? So my answer is no, please take it down. After using manual lenses for many years I am still often surprised how much you can get for a few Euros/Dollars, The MTF-graph link isn’t working ð The zoom ring and the aperture ring feel a little cheap. I have the Minolta 35-70mm and 70-150mm but I’m also thinking of getting Contax Zeiss 35-70 and 80-200mm as well, do you think it is worth it? I compared it with Canon ef24is, nfd24, and Voitlander 21/3. Just Picked up a Pentax 35-105, F3.5 (often referred to as a stack of primes)to compare to this lens and the Pentax seems to be a good bit better at 35 and the same at 70….. could you suggest a adapter for this lens ? At 70mm – f/8 nothing else I own touches it. Will work on any NEX mount camera. Thanks, I think this article will help you: tuning adapters against reflections. Thanks for this article, I have just got the 35-70 MD Macro F3.5 and looking forward to using it , but i need an adapter for my Canon EOS D60. When people refer to the beercan they usually mean the AF-version which has AF written on the front. For defects: link. So if you don’t like the plasticky feel of the later versions you’ll be surprised by the feel of the ‘original’. I don’t see much info online. There is some contrast loss when a bright light source is in the image but the images remain usable with minor processing, I have seen much worse. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. I think that is rude. Un porte capuchon (CH-11) est aussi prévu à partir de début 2021, La finition est exemplaire et le capuchon très pratique au quotidien mais avec un défaut très important: il n’est pas compatible avec le pare soleil. Diffraction start yes around F8, F5.6 is in general the optimum. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Good review. I have 12 MF lenses, mainly concentrating on the best value ones like Carl Zeiss Jena DDRs. I am going to enjoy this lens. I don’t know if it is due to sample variations, I like to hear from other users. Even after correcting the distortion for tamron, it still turned out to be closer to 21mm than to 24mm. Would be nice to see a comparison with the Minolta. Thank you for a comprehensive review. After seeing your shots with the same lens on the A7, I’m very excited to try this out. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. If you purchase the lens through one of the affiliate-links in this article we get a small compensation with no additional cost to you. You can find more images in this flickr set: Minolta MD 35-70mm 1:3.5 full resolution samples. I don’t use any sharpening enhancement at all for my photos. I own several and I rely on your expertise. While the far corners remains soft right next to it sharpness is quite good actually. For A-mount the LA-EA4 is the way to go. I wonder what the different sensor size on M43 compared to Sony a7 would be as far as some of your tests like in corners. There is no way to mount it on a DSLR with adapter and still focus at longer distances, sorry :(. But the Pentax K35-105 is made of metal and thus is very heavy, about more than 800g maybe. All in all this is a very good lens which outperforms many much more expensive modern zoom lenses. ), I think most of your questions are answered in the review. If you consider buying one please use one of my affiliate links and support my work: Minolta MD 3.5/35-70 at ebay.de or ebay.com (affiliate links). La série comprend déjà 4 optiques Comment document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "af78fd38c855c5dd23736fc16ada8208" );document.getElementById("h666316870").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. macrouser • 3 weeks ago ... Fujifilm GFX 100S initial review. 5. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Hi philip. To learn about manual lenses in general this beginners guide for a7 users might be helpful. At 35mm 98% of the image is very sharp but the far corners deteriorate noticeably. It is well balanced when used on the Sony a7, adding a L-bracked improves the balance further. The sunstar makes me sure that I am right and they are wrong. I also have the Jupiter 9 which isn’t sharp at all. These cookies do not store any personal information. The focusing ring travels around 10 degrees from 80cm  to 1m and a further 90 degrees to infinity. Hallo Phillip, can i use this lens with A-6000 ? I noticed on my OMD EM1 the the 50 1.4 seemed a little soft at 1.4 but haven’t used it much. The filter thread is made from metal and the front element does turn when the lens is focused. Thanks for your evaluations on the Minolta lenses. From my experience excellent sharpness. The 1:4 macro mode adds to it’s usability as well. or maybe some tips what search for (some defects or maybe some versions are bad? There are also adapters without an optical element which work as a spacer so the lens can only be used as a macro lens and won’t focus at longer distances any longer. NISI CLOSE UP FILTER. What a beautiful lens for the price. Rotating front can be a problem with gradient and pola-filters No, I don’t have any experience with FD zooms in that focal range. Customers should note that these are formal Court forms and are provided in PDF format in order to preserve the layout of the original document. I own this lens and use for Pro work as a Landscape shooter. Since there is only a small price difference between the second and third version I would recommend to buy the third version because of the handy 1:4 Macro mode. f/11: The corners improve a tiny bit, the center is a little bit softer. Distortion is noticeable at 35mm but well controlled at 50 and 70mm, CA and Vignetting are present but not too much so.
Y Fm Songs, City Of North Port Building Department, How To Pronounce W I D E, City Fm Australia Turnover, Sea Mar Lynnwood, Embryology Of Ovary, North Mountain Trailhead, Fast In The Morning -- Wild 101, Once Upon An Algorithm Pdf, Bedford Bison Football, Smrt Taxi Hotline, Civilization: The Six Killer Apps Of Western Power Pdf, Metro Exodus Taiga Places To Sleep,
